<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BlingNoMore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore</link>
	<description>Discussing Real Sustainability Not Eco-Bling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Shot in the Foot</title>
		<link>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2011/11/a-shot-in-the-foot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2011/11/a-shot-in-the-foot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government has offered the prospect of PV to millions of homeowners only to snatch it away again before anyone had a chance to install it! ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2011/11/a-shot-in-the-foot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the Skin of Their Teeth</title>
		<link>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/11/by-the-skin-of-their-teeth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/11/by-the-skin-of-their-teeth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coalition has amended a major piece of carbon legislation and so by the skin of its teeth avoided the unintended consequence of increased carbon emissions.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/11/by-the-skin-of-their-teeth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Code for Unsustainable Homes</title>
		<link>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/code-for-unsustainable-homes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/code-for-unsustainable-homes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislating the Code for Sustainable Homes: Yet another piece of well meaning but ultimately stupid legislation that could lead to excessive energy consumption through rigid adherence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/code-for-unsustainable-homes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More London Please</title>
		<link>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/no-more-london-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/no-more-london-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eco-Bling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is something wrong about environmental ratings that reward buildings that are just as energy guzzling as all the rest, but are fed with a scarce renewable fuel.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/no-more-london-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hooray for Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/hooray-for-capitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/hooray-for-capitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we had re-invested the profits from fossil fuels in carbon abatement, rather than lining the pockets of a few, we might not be faced with climate change at all. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougking.co.uk/blingnomore/2010/08/hooray-for-capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

